Survivors say the Epstein Client List exists—and they’re ready to expose the powerful names on it
It looks like the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking empire ain’t waiting on the government no more—they’re taking justice into their own hands.
Survivors are banding together to create what they call an independent “client list” of high-profile individuals who were allegedly involved in their abuse. This bold move comes after the DOJ and FBI once again claimed no such list exists in their official records. But the survivors calling it cap.
Survivors Step Up: “We Know the Names”
Lisa Phillips, a former model and Epstein survivor, didn’t mince words when she told reporters:
“Several of us Epstein survivors have been discussing creating our own list of names. We know the names. Many of us were abused by them.”

She emphasized the list will be confidentially compiled by survivors, for survivors—but made it clear this is no bluff. It’s the latest power move in the fight for transparency and justice.
This comes just after Congress dropped 33,000+ pages of Epstein-related documents. But survivors say most of it was recycled junk already in the public domain.
Government Says “No List”—Survivors Say “Try Again”
Both the FBI and Department of Justice have doubled down on the claim: there is no official client list. But that’s not sitting right with anyone, especially afterAG Pam Bondi once hinted that such a list did exist.

Meanwhile, Reps. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Ro Khanna (D-CA) are trying to force transparency with the Epstein Files Transparency Act—a bill that would require the full public release of all Epstein-related documents.
They just need two more Republican votes to make it happen, but of course, politics always finds a way to block progress.
Trump Calls It a “Democrat Hoax”
Adding fuel to the already blazing fire, Donald Trump brushed off the push for transparency as a “Democrat hoax.” Survivors and their supporters say that kind of dismissiveness only proves why the list needs to be dropped.
They argue the secrecy around Epstein’s network is about protecting the rich and powerful, not the victims.



